Re: [AMBER] multi source calls in tleap

From: Alan <alanwilter.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:45:30 +0100

Thanks guys for your answer. I don't think it's a bug but more like a
"protection" as you mentioned Matias.

And I'm aware those are old FF, I was just testing my old tutorials in
order to update them and I was concerned, but not tested yet, the
combination that Matias ended up showing in his example, would not work
anymore, but I guess it should work.

I could eventually look into the source code to know exactly what tleap is
doing but that's fine for the moment.

BTW, what about FF19SB instead of FF14SB?

Best wishes,

Alan

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 14:53, Matias Machado <mmachado.pasteur.edu.uy>
wrote:

> Dear Alan,
>
> These feature is present since AMBER 16 or so (at leat that is the oldest
> version I've tied)...
>
> I don't think it is a bug, but Dave should certainly know better that me...
>
> I think it is some kind of safe-lock to prevent users from doing
> potentially wrong things... such as over-witting force fields...
>
> Indeed, oldff/leaprc.ff99SB and oldff/leaprc.ff99bsc0 load almost the same
> stuff, but for the bsc0 parameters of DNA.
>
> Hence the right way to load the force field is just "source
> oldff/leaprc.ff99bsc0"
>
> Anyway, as David mention, both the parameters and the way to load them are
> very old fashion...
>
> One proper way to do it at present is:
>
> source leaprc.protein.ff14SB
> source leaprc.water.tip3p
> source leaprc.DNA.bsc1
>
> Best,
>
> MatΓ­as
>
> PS: I'm stating to use "leaprc.water.opc" and OP3 (OPC3) water model,
> which is much better than TIP3P for the same price :-P
>
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: "David A Case" <david.case.rutgers.edu>
> Para: "AMBER Mailing List" <amber.ambermd.org>
> Enviados: Lunes, 8 de Febrero 2021 11:50:07
> Asunto: Re: [AMBER] multi source calls in tleap
>
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021, Alan wrote:
>
> >I've only noticed that now in ambertools 2020, perhaps that happened years
> >ago, but my tleap scripts used to have:
> >
> >source oldff/leaprc.ff99SB
> >...
> >source oldff/leaprc.ff99bsc0
>
> >Which now throws an error.
>
> Looks like a bug to me. I've submitted a fix for the upcoming
> AmberTools21.
> Thanks for the report.
>
> Is there a command to "unload" or "unsource" loaded parameters?
>
> No.
>
> >For now I've just broken my one script in several scripts, which is fine
> >but, still, it would be nice to know more about it.
>
> Just hoping here that you have a good reason to be using such outdated
> force
> fields.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>


-- 
Alan Silva πŸš²πŸŠβ€β™‚πŸƒβ€β™‚πŸ‡§πŸ‡·πŸ‡«πŸ‡·πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Feb 15 2021 - 00:00:02 PST
Custom Search