Dear Ross,
Thank you very much, Is the OC make it an unknown issue?
Since RMA is not a possible option in my country, I have to be very
cautious about the GPU specification before buying it.
So I would be very grateful if you could recommend me the appropriate
GPU(s) from the following GTX780 list?
Here are the different editions of GTX780 which I took from Asus website:
ROG POSEIDON-GTX780-P-3GD5
<
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/ROG_POSEIDONGTX780P3GD5/>
GTX780-DC2OC-3GD5 <
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/GTX780DC2OC3GD5/>
STRIX-GTX780-OC-6GD5 <
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/STRIXGTX780OC6GD5/>
ROG POSEIDON-GTX780-3GD5
<
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/ROG_POSEIDONGTX7803GD5/>
GTX780-DC2-3GD5 <
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/GTX780DC23GD5/>
GTX780-3GD5 <
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/GTX7803GD5/>
http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/
Regards,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Reza,
>
> I have not tried any STRIX branded GPUs - and must admit to not actually
> knowing what it stands for. My suggestion would be to suck it and see.
> (Asus tend to be a nice brand though).
>
> Once you receive the GPU run the AMBER validation test on it:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/708185/GPU_Validation_Test.tar.gz
>
> And if all answers do not come out the same - RMA it and got for a regular
> clock (or these days regular OC) card.
>
> All the best
> Ross
>
>
>
> On 11/15/14, 2:41 AM, "M. Reza Ganjalikhany" <ganjalikhany.gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >How about STRIX OC edition of GTX780?
> >Is STRIX edition suitable for GPU accelerated MD?
> >
> >such as:
> >ASUS STRIX-GTX780-OC-6GD5
> >GeForce GTX 780 - 6GB - STRIX
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Agreed - although to caveat that - the GTX780 silicon is fairly mature
> >> these days and from the various hardware I have been testing the
> >> superclocked chips actually seem to be okay right now. You should still
> >> test it to be sure but given it is fairly mature silicon the yields (and
> >> thus achievable clock speeds) tend to drift upwards with time. E.g. I
> >> certainly would not entertain an overclocked GTX980 right now. But in a
> >> year - maybe...
> >>
> >> As for brand both Asus and EVGA tend to be pretty good brands so that's
> >> not a worry.
> >>
> >> All the best
> >> Ross
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/28/14, 12:59 PM, "Scott Le Grand" <varelse2005.gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Superclocked is a "super" way to get inaccurate results. Avoid...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:50 PM, M. Reza Ganjalikhany <
> >> >ganjalikhany.gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Thank you very much fro your help.
> >> >>
> >> >> And the last question:
> >> >> Is there any difference between EVGA GTX 780
> >> >> <
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CTY84KI/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UT
> >>
> >>>>F8&camp=211189&creative=373489&creativeASIN=B00CTY84KI&link_code=as3&ta
> >>>>g=
> >> >>freelydownloa-20
> >> >> >
> >> >> and ASUS GTX 780 (GTX780-3GD5)
> >> >> <http://www.asus.com/Graphics_Cards/GTX7803GD5/>?
> >> >> It seems that EVGA has superclocked option while ASUS doesn't have.
> >> >> Does superclocked option play an important role in GPU performance?
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > 780TI is about the same speed as a Titan-Black but (in about 70% of
> >> >> cases)
> >> >> > gives incorrect numerical answers.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 780 on the other hand gives the correct numerical answers.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > So, my advice is to go with 780 or Titan-Black and avoid 780TI.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > All the best
> >> >> > Ross
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 10/28/14, 2:41 AM, "M. Reza Ganjalikhany"
> >><ganjalikhany.gmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > >what is the difference between GTX 780 and GTX780Ti in
> >>performance?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Scott Le Grand
> >> >><varelse2005.gmail.com
> >> >> >
> >> >> > >wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >> The successor is the Asus X99-E WS plus Core i7-5930K CPU.
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:39 PM, M. Reza Ganjalikhany <
> >> >> > >> ganjalikhany.gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> > Dear Amber Developers,
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > I decided to assemble my own PC with GPU enabled according to
> >> >>your
> >> >> > >> website
> >> >> > >> > recommendation.
> >> >> > >> > Due to some hardware limitations, the recommended Motherboard
> >> >> (P9X79-E
> >> >> > >> WS)
> >> >> > >> > is not available but other P9X79 families are available such
> >>as
> >> >> P9X79
> >> >> > >>WS,
> >> >> > >> > P9X79 DELUX and P9X79. Is this make the GPU simulation so
> >> >>different
> >> >> > >>if I
> >> >> > >> > use P9X79 WS instead of E WS?
> >> >> > >> > What is the main point which should be noticed?
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> > Regards,
> >> >> > >> > M.Reza
> >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > >> > AMBER mailing list
> >> >> > >> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> >> > >> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> > >> AMBER mailing list
> >> >> > >> AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> >> > >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >_______________________________________________
> >> >> > >AMBER mailing list
> >> >> > >AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> >> > >http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > AMBER mailing list
> >> >> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> >> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> AMBER mailing list
> >> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >> >>
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >AMBER mailing list
> >> >AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> >http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AMBER mailing list
> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >AMBER mailing list
> >AMBER.ambermd.org
> >http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Nov 16 2014 - 00:00:02 PST
