Re: [AMBER] conversion of gromacs trajectory file (xtc) to amber trajectory file (mdcrd) / problem in water molecules

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.EDU>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 09:46:27 -0800

> [different coords for amber & gromacs]

Again, I wonder if you properly solved the problem of ions being
in different places in the amber prmtop than in your gromacs
trajectory.

Bill

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Dec 29 2010 - 10:00:05 PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jason Swails: "Re: [AMBER] Is MM-PBSA energy for protein-DNA (~ 40 base pairs) as large as -400 kcal/mol reasonable?"
Previous message: Kevin Hauser: "Re: [AMBER] Is MM-PBSA energy for protein-DNA (~ 40 base pairs) as large as -400 kcal/mol reasonable?"
Maybe in reply to: leila karami: "[AMBER] conversion of gromacs trajectory file (xtc) to amber trajectory file (mdcrd) / problem in water molecules"
Next in thread: leila karami: "Re: [AMBER] conversion of gromacs trajectory file (xtc) to amber trajectory file (mdcrd) / problem in water molecules"
Reply: leila karami: "Re: [AMBER] conversion of gromacs trajectory file (xtc) to amber trajectory file (mdcrd) / problem in water molecules"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Custom Search