Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 19:31:46 +0000
Dear Sir/Mdm,
I have an enquiry on what is the best approach to simulating phosphorylated residues.
I have come across 3 different methods, each with their pros and cons, and I am not quite sure how to proceed.
Approach 1)
In previous forum posts many years ago, parameters from http://amber.manchester.ac.uk/ were recommended, but I am not sure if they are still up to date with the latest parameterisations or if they are compatible with forcefields like ff14SB or ff19SB
Approach 2)
CHARM-GUI is able to parameterise the residues provided. However, it seems to always protonate the PO4 2- phosphate group to become PO4H – instead, which is not desirable for the simulation. I have asked CHARM-GUI forums for a way to solve this problem
Approach 3)
I have parameterised custom-residues using this excellent tutorial here before, with antechamber, RESP and prepgen.
https://ambermd.org/tutorials/basic/tutorial5/index.php
How would this option compare?
Thank you!
Best wishes,
Mingxuan Jiang
Postgraduate
Creixell Lab
CRUK Cambridge Institute
University of Cambridge
[signature_3923700459] [signature_3619670221]
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
(image/png attachment: image001.png)
(image/png attachment: image002.png)
