Dr. Case, the diff value is attached.
What do you think about the seriousness?
Yes, I think mdgx was built. I can try next to use the flag correctly (without quotes) like Scott suggested.
Best,
Matthew
> On Nov 10, 2022, at 9:04 AM, David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> *Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022, Matthew Guberman-Pfeffer via AMBER wrote:
>>
>>
>> I found run_cmake, not run.cmake. Assuming it’s the same file, I added
>> -DDISABLE_TOOLS=“mdgx”, but cmake complained:
>>
>> Parse error in command line argument: -DDISABLE_TOOLS
>> Should be: VAR:type=value
>> CMake Error: No cmake script provided.
>
> Sounds like you didn't add the -DDISABLE_TOOLS in the proper way. It is not
> a command-line argument, but you put it inside the run_cmake script itself.
>
>> If I omit -DDISABLE_TOOLS, cmake works, and the following installation
>> looks fine,
>
> Is mdgx built with this run?
>
>> but when I run the tests, I get the below errors:
>>
>> possible FAILURE: check bis_2.out.dif
>> possible FAILURE: check spc.xvv.other.dif
>> possible FAILURE: check nve.out.dif
>
> Look at nve.out.dif and the other: do the errors look serious? It may be
> that you won't have to worry about these errors.
>>
>
> .....dac
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Nov 10 2022 - 06:30:03 PST
