[AMBER] Charged species with antechamber

From: Sam Walsworth (Researcher) <"Sam>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:01:34 +0000

Hi all

I am aware that you can use antechamber to parameterise charged molecules (using the -nc flag) but I was considering if this is a reliable/tested method? I'm currently going through tLEaP and received an error saying 'The unperturbed charge of the unit (1.001001)<tel:+441001001> is not zero' which I'm assuming corresponds to my molecule having a -1 charge (-nc 1).

My question is how good is antechamber at handling charged molecules? Are these error messages largely trivial or should I be cautious using this method (maybe would manually assigning charges from ab initio calculations be better?)

Sam
University of Huddersfield inspiring global professionals.
[http://marketing.hud.ac.uk/_HOSTED/EmailSig2014/EmailSigFooterMarch2019.jpg]

This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you receive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and remove it from your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to the business of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse it and will accept no liability.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Dec 10 2020 - 07:30:02 PST
Custom Search