Re: [AMBER] Testing New Parameters For a Novel boron Force Field.. is my advisors' strange approach true?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 04:57:15 -0700

The boron did nothing in the simulation

> /The dog did nothing in the night-time./

"Individuals who used more emojis obtained more dates, had more sex, and
more sexual partners."

https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1162614836137738241

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Aug 24 2019 - 05:00:03 PDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Lachele Foley: "Re: [AMBER] Glycolipid Simulation"
Previous message: Bill Ross: "Re: [AMBER] Testing New Parameters For a Novel boron Force Field.. is my advisors' strange approach true?"
In reply to: Bill Ross: "Re: [AMBER] Testing New Parameters For a Novel boron Force Field.. is my advisors' strange approach true?"
Next in thread: Erdem Yeler: "Re: [AMBER] Testing New Parameters For a Novel boron Force Field.. is my advisors' strange approach true?"
Reply: Erdem Yeler: "Re: [AMBER] Testing New Parameters For a Novel boron Force Field.. is my advisors' strange approach true?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Custom Search