[AMBER] Nastruct vs 3DNA

From: Jason Imamoto <jimamoto.mail.usciences.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:12:37 -0400

Hello Users,

I had a question about the nastruct command compared to x3dna. The current nastruct does not seem capable of identifying non-canonical base-pairs. Are there variables that can be changed for it to recognize non-canonical base-pairs to acquire base and base-step parameters? I know that x3dna is capable of producing those parameters and since nastruct is based on x3dna, I would think it is capable of doing the same analysis.

Thank you for your time and help.

Jason M. Imamoto
Doctoral Candidate
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
GH 302
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
600 S 43rd St. Philadelphia, PA 19104

Email: jimamoto.mail.usciences.edu


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Mar 18 2019 - 10:30:03 PDT
Custom Search