Re: [AMBER] Antechamber Algorithm for Atom Type

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:14:41 -0400

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Hannes Loeffler <
Hannes.Loeffler.stfc.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:56:02 -0400
> Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ​Also, purine is a rather common biological fragment, so ​I doubt it
> > lies outside of the chemical space targeted by antechamber.
>
> But it is not a purine because C5 and N4 are swapped (numbering
> according to the OP's pasted PDB file), whatever this is now called.
> What that means for the chemistry I do not know.
>

​Ah, right you are. Looks a lot like one at first glance, though :).
Still, parmchk2 should probably find reasonable starting guesses for the
parameters (since the atom types won't be too drastically different from
what would be assigned to a purine).

Jason

-- 
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Apr 28 2015 - 07:30:03 PDT
Custom Search