Kenneth,
It should also be "space=1.0" in the python script if Wes has put it
in. If not, please insert it into the .mdin file to test it. Let us
know what you find …
Thanks a lot!
All the best,
Ray
--
Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor,
Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Kenneth Huang
<kennethneltharion.gmail.com> wrote:
> Ray,
>
> Is there a corresponding keyword to determine space=1.0 in the MMPBSA
> input, or is it only present in the PB input from _MMPBSA_pb.mdin? If the
> latter, I've been able to run PB.in with space=0.5 through mmpbsa_py_energy
> directly without issue. But if it is a very possible memory related issue,
> why would it be that it crashes on PB only when I've chosen to use sander,
> yet without sander being used it'll crash at GB instead? I've been working
> under the assumption that GB does go through some surface calculations, but
> not nearly as rigorous as those that PB employs.
>
> I will see what I can do about testing it out on a different workstation
> with more available memory to see what happens, though.
>
> Best,
>
> Kenneth
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
>
>> Looks like there is not enough memory on your compute node to compute
>> the expensive SES surface for PB …
>>
>> If the error goes away when you set space = 1.0 (i.e. 1 Angstrom
>> instead of 0.5 Angstrom), it'd confirm my guess.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Ray
>> --
>> Ray Luo, Ph.D.
>> Professor,
>> Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, Chemical Physics,
>> Chemical and Biomedical Engineering
>> University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > This is, indeed, strange.
>> >
>> > Can you send me a of files I can use to reproduce this problem off-list?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Jason
>> >
>> >> On Jan 12, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Kenneth Huang <kennethneltharion.gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dear all,
>> >>
>> >> I'm running into a frankly bizarre error with MMPBSA using AmberTools14.
>> >> After generating my complex/ligand/receptor prmtop files with
>> ante-MMPBSA
>> >> using this command-
>> >>
>> >> ante-MMPBSA.py -p sol.prmtop -c com.prmtop -r rec.prmtop -l lig.prmtop
>> -s
>> >> ':WAT,:Na+' -n ':1-521,:1562-2082'
>> >>
>> >> I then tried testing a short, two frame test run in MMPBSA with my
>> input as-
>> >>
>> >> &general
>> >> startframe=269, endframe=270, interval=1, keep_files=2,
>> >> receptor_mask=':522-1561:2083-2084', ligand_mask=':1-521:1562-2082',
>> >> strip_mask=':WAT:Na+',
>> >> /
>> >> &gb
>> >> igb=5,
>> >> /
>> >> &pb
>> >> radiopt=0, indi=2.0,
>> >> /
>> >>
>> >> Which then proceeded to crash with a CalcError failure with the complex.
>> >> The log showed that it was crashing at GB calculations, but checking
>> >> _MMPBSA_complex_gb.mdout.0 only provided this-
>> >>
>> >> Processing ASCII trajectory (_MMPBSA_complex.mdcrd.0)
>> >>
>> >> Processing frame 1
>> >> iter Total bad vdW elect nonpolar genBorn
>> >> frms
>> >>
>> >> So trying to see what exactly was causing the crash, I ran MMPBSA with
>> >> use_sander=1 in the input. Strangely enough, the log file/outputs show
>> it
>> >> crashing with the same complex CalcError at PB instead of GB.
>> >> _MMPBSA_complex_gb.mdout.0 is actually completing, or doing a very good
>> job
>> >> of looking as if it's successful- but checking
>> _MMPBSA_complex_pb.mdout.0
>> >> gives me this message-
>> >>
>> >> POST-PROCESSING OF TRAJECTORY ENERGIES
>> >> Cpptraj Generated trajectory
>> >>
>> >> minimizing coord set # 1
>> >> SA Bomb in sa_arc(): Allocates aborted 3 0 5014 5014 0 0
>> >>
>> >> I figured I'd try running mmpbsa_py_energy to see if I couldn't get a
>> more
>> >> clear idea of what the error was, but oddly enough running
>> _MMPBSA_pb.mdin
>> >> and _MMPBSA_gb.mdin with mmpbsa_py_energy both seem to complete without
>> a
>> >> problem-
>> >>
>> >> BOND = 6139.4423 ANGLE = 16044.7359 DIHED =
>> >> 25743.7335
>> >> VDWAALS = -16859.4284 EEL = -151313.2641 EGB =
>> >> -19146.8926
>> >> 1-4 VDW = 7348.3643 1-4 EEL = 82548.4930 RESTRAINT =
>> >> 0.0000
>> >> ESURF = 590.8814
>> >>
>> >> MM/GBSA processing done!
>> >>
>> >> BOND = 6139.4423 ANGLE = 16044.7359 DIHED =
>> >> 25743.7335
>> >> VDWAALS = -16859.4284 EEL = -75656.6320 EPB =
>> >> -10359.5105
>> >> 1-4 VDW = 7348.3643 1-4 EEL = 82548.4930 RESTRAINT =
>> >> 0.0000
>> >> ECAVITY = 15063.6475 EDISPER = -7396.2674
>> >> MM/PBSA processing done!
>> >>
>> >> Total surface charge 7.9234
>> >> Reaction field energy -10359.5105
>> >> Cavity solvation energy 15063.6475
>> >> Dispersion solvation energy -7396.2674
>> >>
>> >> I've tried running MMPBSA on a slightly different system that
>> >> also uses requisite prmtop files using the same command for ante-MMPBSA,
>> >> and the behavior is exactly the same. Yet when I run MMPBSA on a
>> different
>> >> system that uses prmtop files that I haven't made using ante-MMPBSA,
>> it's
>> >> able to run without a problem.
>> >>
>> >> At this point, I'm not really sure what to make of this error- I was
>> >> initially thinking it might've been a problem with my mask selection for
>> >> the ligand/receptor, but that mmpbsa_py_energy is actually able to give
>> >> outputs has me wondering if there's something wrong with how I made the
>> >> prmtops with ante-MMPBSA, or something else is going on entirely.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >> Kenneth
>> >> --
>> >> Ask yourselves, all of you, what power would hell have if those
>> imprisoned
>> >> here could not dream of heaven?
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> AMBER mailing list
>> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jason M. Swails
>> > BioMaPS,
>> > Rutgers University
>> > Postdoctoral Researcher
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AMBER mailing list
>> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ask yourselves, all of you, what power would hell have if those imprisoned
> here could not dream of heaven?
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jan 13 2015 - 10:30:02 PST