[AMBER] Ordering of torsion definitions

From: Peter Eastman <peastman.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:06:20 -0700

Another question about interpreting parameter files. The format documentation at http://ambermd.org/formats.html includes the following comment:

"Important note: all general type improper dihedrals (e.g. x -x -ct-hc) should appear before all specifics (ct-ct-ct-hc) in the parm list. Otherwise the generals will override the
 specific with no warning."

That sounds straightforward: later definitions override earlier ones, and all general definitions should come before all specific ones. But when I look in frcmod.ff99SBildn I see the exact opposite: the general definitions come AFTER the specific ones. Does this really mean the general definitions are intended to override the specific ones? That seems very unlikely. Is this a bug? Or is the documentation incorrect, and AMBER actually uses a different rule for deciding which definition to use? If so, what is that rule?

Peter


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Oct 04 2011 - 10:30:03 PDT
Custom Search