Re: [AMBER] Amber parmbsc0 vs ff99

From: Marek Maly <marek.maly.ujep.cz>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:43:12 +0200

OK,

perfect that.s what I wanted to know.

So just to be really sure:

In case of simulation:

a)
Nucleic acids systems: BEFORE bsc0 NOW equivalent with using ff10

b)
Proteins systems: BEFORE ff99SB NOW equivalent with using ff10

c)
Proteins + nucleid acids systems: BEFORE (ff99SB + bsc0) now equivalent
with using just ff10


  Am I right ?

       Best wishes,

          Marek



Dne Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:24:56 +0200 Brian Radak <radak004.umn.edu>
napsal/-a:

> I believe ff99SB is only for amino acids (improves helicity or
> something).
> It is almost certainly included in ff10 by default.
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Thomas Cheatham <tec3.utah.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>> > For nucleic acids:
>>
>> ...to clarify: for RNA:
>>
>> > ff10 = ff99 + bsc0 + reparameterized glycosidic torsions
>>
>> ...for DNA,
>>
>> ff10 = ff99 + bsc0
>>
>> (since the reparameterized glycosidic torsions do not work particularly
>> well for DNA).
>>
>> --tec3
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratným poštovním klientem Opery:  
http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Sep 22 2011 - 09:30:03 PDT
Custom Search