Re: [AMBER] Amber parmbsc0 vs ff99

From: Brian Radak <radak004.umn.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:24:56 -0400

I believe ff99SB is only for amino acids (improves helicity or something).
It is almost certainly included in ff10 by default.

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Thomas Cheatham <tec3.utah.edu> wrote:

>
> > For nucleic acids:
>
> ...to clarify: for RNA:
>
> > ff10 = ff99 + bsc0 + reparameterized glycosidic torsions
>
> ...for DNA,
>
> ff10 = ff99 + bsc0
>
> (since the reparameterized glycosidic torsions do not work particularly
> well for DNA).
>
> --tec3
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>

-- 
================================ Current Address =======================
 Brian Radak                                             :     BioMaPS
Institute for Quantitative Biology
 PhD candidate - York Research Group       :     Rutgers, The State
University of New Jersey
 University of Minnesota - Twin Cities         :     Wright-Rieman Hall 101
 Graduate Program in Chemical Physics     :     610 Taylor Road,
 Department of Chemistry                          :     Piscataway, NJ
08854-8066
 radak004.umn.edu                                 :
radakb.biomaps.rutgers.edu
====================================================================
Sorry for the multiple e-mail addresses, just use the institute appropriate
address.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

Received on Thu Sep 22 2011 - 08:30:08 PDT