1. Gcc version:
[voronkov.t60-2 CLUSTER]$ which gcc
/usr/bin/gcc
[voronkov.t60-2 CLUSTER]$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070626 (ALT Linux, build 4.1.2-alt2)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. šThere is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[voronkov.t60-2 CLUSTER]$
2. No there is no .o files in the nab directory. (only .c, .nab, .h, .l, .awk, .f, .y)
Maybe as far as this is cluster I should use 64 bit version of gnu.
3. I have deleted Amber and installed it again....it works, installation is fine! :)
Best regards,
Andrew
29.05.2011, 21:45, "case" <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>;;:
> ššOn Sun, May 29, 2011, Andrew Voronkov wrote:
>> šššThat was acutally cluster compilation, but I have used standarad:
>> ššš/cofigure gnu
>> šššCC=gcc
>> šššFC=gfortran
> ššSo, can you try to figure out where the "x86_64-alt-linux-gcc" comes from?
>>>> šššš-bash: x86_64-alt-linux-gcc:: command not found
> ššWhat is the result of "which gcc" and "gcc --version"?
> ššNote that the configure script checks that your version of gcc works, so it's
> ššhard to see why it should fail later on in the process.
>
> ššAlso, is there a cgen.o file (or any *.o files) in
> šš$AMBERHOME/AmberTools/src/nab? šIf so, be sure to get rid of them. šDoes the
> ššsame error happen with a clean installation (unpack the AmberTools-1.5.tar bz2
> ššfile in a completely new directory tree)?
>
> šš....dac
>
> šš_______________________________________________
> ššAMBER mailing list
> ššAMBER.ambermd.org
> ššhttp://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon May 30 2011 - 12:30:03 PDT
