Re: [AMBER] NTT=3 or NTT=1

From: Tom Joseph <ttjoseph.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:59:17 -0400

2010/5/9 Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>:
> you will get better performance if you are running in parallel
> using ntt=1 than you will using ntt=3 (without some undocumented compile
> time 'hacks')

Would you be able to elaborate on these hacks (and how they might
affect the results)? I've been running lots of ntt=3 and an
improvement in parallel scaling would be most welcome...

Thanks very much,
--Tom

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon May 10 2010 - 11:30:04 PDT
Custom Search