> > "dpinit.F90", line 240: error: missing '.
> 
> Try removing the initial "&" from line 240.  That should not be there, but
> apparently most compilers don't complain.
Oddly enough the leading ampersand on a continuation line is not a
problem on lines 139-140, 146-147, 153-154, 161-162 etc. of the same
file.
Removing the leading ampersand from line 240 changes nothing, the
compiler still barfs.  Commenting out the entire line
  &  ' Will not use the radii specified in block.F'
causes the error message to remain otherwise the same but indicate the
next line instead.
Printing out something that doesn't end in & !! on line 239 makes the
problem go away.
My FORTRAN-fu is regrettably far too weak to analyse this one any further.
I have another Sun issue now that the first one was circumvented:
f90 -c -O1    -free -M../../sander -I../src/include -DHAS_LAPACK -DQMMM -o ../obj/tsqna.o ../src/ts/tsqna.F90
        &     '('' Lambda too large& ! Scaled Down'', &
                                   ^
"../src/ts/tsqna.F90", Line = 453, Column = 36: ERROR: Unknown edit descriptor "M" has been detected.
                                                ^       
"../src/ts/tsqna.F90", Line = 453, Column = 49: ERROR: Unknown edit descriptor "v" has been detected.
                                                                 ^
"../src/ts/tsqna.F90", Line = 453, Column = 66: ERROR: Missing right parenthesis or unexpected end of FORMAT specifier.
f90comp: 857 SOURCE LINES
f90comp: 3 ERRORS, 0 WARNINGS, 0 OTHER MESSAGES, 0 ANSI
*** Error code 1
Regarding the SGI bit:
> I can't see any problem with the code here, and this syntax is used in many
> places in the "ncsu" modules.  Did you successfully compile any of the ncsu-
> files?
ncsu-umbrella.f was compiled successfully.  ncsu-abmd-hooks is the next
one and nothing else had been tried so far.
> You could try the following experiment: UMBRELLA_MAX_NEXTENTS is defined this
> way:
The experiment you suggested allows ncsu-abmd-hooks.f to compile.  None
of the other ncsu-* files present any problems.
> It could be that the SGI f90 code is not correctly handling these sorts of
> indirections.
It could be.  The likelihood of any further patches to the MIPSpro
compilers seems a little slim, unfortunately.
-- 
Atro Tossavainen (Mr.)               / The Institute of Biotechnology at
Systems Analyst, Techno-Amish &     / the University of Helsinki, Finland,
+358-9-19158939  UNIX Dinosaur     / employs me, but my opinions are my own.
< URL : http : / / www . helsinki . fi / %7E atossava / > NO FILE ATTACHMENTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
      to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Mon Dec 15 2008 - 01:10:51 PST