Re: AMBER: bug in reprocessing with PB?

From: David A. Case <>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:24:20 -0700

On Thu, May 10, 2007, David Mobley wrote:

> However, I'm attaching a tarball for one case that fails
> (with PB) on either architecture. Again, it reprocesses fine using GB.

Nothing was attached(!?!).

Ray: if you or your people can look at this, it would be great: we need to
make the pb routines in sander more reliable...thx


The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Sun May 13 2007 - 06:07:28 PDT
Custom Search