Re: AMBER: bug in reprocessing with PB?

From: David A. Case <case.scripps.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 11:24:20 -0700

On Thu, May 10, 2007, David Mobley wrote:

> However, I'm attaching a tarball for one case that fails
> (with PB) on either architecture. Again, it reprocesses fine using GB.

Nothing was attached(!?!).

Ray: if you or your people can look at this, it would be great: we need to
make the pb routines in sander more reliable...thx

...dac

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun May 13 2007 - 06:07:28 PDT
Custom Search