Re: AMBER: bug in reprocessing with PB?

From: David Mobley <dmobley.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:18:23 -0700

All,

Sorry, here's the attachment.

David


On 5/10/07, David A. Case <case.scripps.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007, David Mobley wrote:
>
> > However, I'm attaching a tarball for one case that fails
> > (with PB) on either architecture. Again, it reprocesses fine using GB.
>
> Nothing was attached(!?!).
>
> Ray: if you or your people can look at this, it would be great: we need to
> make the pb routines in sander more reliable...thx
>
> ...dac
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu

Received on Sun May 13 2007 - 06:07:29 PDT
Custom Search