Re: AMBER: Mg2+ issues of using MM-PB/GBSA

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.stonybrook.edu>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:26:11 -0500

I don't know the answer but I would worry about whether the
force field itself works for divalent cations without polarizability.
There might be more errors than just the solvation model.

mingche Pan wrote:

> Dear AMBER users,
>
> I wonder whether I can use MM-PB/GBSA method to calculate the binding
> free energy in the case of Mg2+ directly involving in the ligand
> binding. The initial tests showed that the energy difference
> calculated by different GB methods is up to ~80 kcal/mol, and the
> difference between GB and PB models is also quite large, over 50
> kcal/mol. In addition, different Born radii of Mg2+ (from 0.99 ĘC
> 1.45) also seem giving various energies, ranging from -10 to -130
> kcal/mol.
>
> I would appreciate if someone can explain a bit more on this issue,
> and suggest a method I can use for this situation.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Mingche Pan
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://www.rosswalker.co.uk/adsense_alternatives/
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Thu Dec 01 2005 - 19:53:00 PST
Custom Search