Re: AMBER: amber8 parallel sander

From: Kathleen Erickson <kathleen.massivelyparallel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:44:39 -0600

Peter: So are you saying that scaling efficiencies beyond 8 CPUs are better
achieved with NAMD? In other words, is 8 CPUs the limit for most
effiencient scaling on AMBER? I'd like to know at which point AMBER users
find they need to switch to NAMD or some other MD package. -Kathleen
 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Thu Sep 22 2005 - 17:53:01 PDT
Custom Search