Kathleen Erickson wrote:
> Peter: So are you saying that scaling efficiencies beyond 8 CPUs are
> better achieved with NAMD? In other words, is 8 CPUs the limit for
> most effiencient scaling on AMBER? I'd like to know at which point
> AMBER users find they need to switch to NAMD or some other MD
> package. -Kathleen
>
Kathleen,
On a massively parallel machine such as Blue Gene/L, we have gonve well
beyond 8 processors using sander.
No, 8 CPUs is not the limit.
Carlos P. Sosa
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Fri Sep 23 2005 - 13:53:00 PDT
