Dear Amber users,
I have gone through the Amber mailist archive, but I didn't find an answer for this question. Why generally the calculated B-factor from Amber trajectory is higher (in magnitude) than its crytallographic values? I took the trajectory files from sander output. If it is reasonable, could you cite me some publications about that?
Thanks,
Bimo
ITB - Stuttgart
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze
Received on Wed Jun 11 2003 - 19:53:01 PDT
