calculated b-factor higher than x-ray

From: Bimo Ario Tejo <>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:23:03 +0200

Dear Amber users,

I have gone through the Amber mailist archive, but I didn't find an answer for this question. Why generally the calculated B-factor from Amber trajectory is higher (in magnitude) than its crytallographic values? I took the trajectory files from sander output. If it is reasonable, could you cite me some publications about that?

ITB - Stuttgart
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze
Received on Wed Jun 11 2003 - 19:53:01 PDT
Custom Search