Re: [AMBER] Mg2+ parameters: Optimized or CM

From: David A Case via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 10:30:35 -0700

On Wed, Jan 07, 2026, Mandar Kulkarni via AMBER wrote:

...just to expand (a bit) on what Zhen alread said:
>
>I am curious if IOD parameters instead of CM are better for structural
>refinements of modeled RNAs? It is mentioned in the manual, but I could not
>find any citation in the context of nucleic acids.

See References 149 and 150 in the Amber 2025 Reference Manual for
RNA-specific suggestions. Further info below.

Be sure to study the "Metal Ion Binding Tutorial" (tutorial 2.4 at the Amber
Web site.) This is a wide-ranging tutorial, but for divalent ions
interacting with RNA, I recommend burrowing down to here:

   https://ambermd.org/tutorials/advanced/tutorial20/12_6_4.php

(This is the tutorial that Zhen recommended.)

Then go down even further to Example B, for parameters particularly tuned to
RNA. Of course, as you can see, there are *many* possibilities that you
might consider; but the "Panteva et al." parameters certainly be on the list
of things you might try.

...good luck...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jan 07 2026 - 10:00:02 PST
Custom Search