Re: [AMBER] cpptraj and nastruct

From: Daniel Roe via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:00:24 -0400

On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 11:49 AM David A Case via AMBER
<amber.ambermd.org> wrote:
>
> I think Dan is correct about needing to see a structure. Parallel strand
> duplexes may have never been tested, and it's not hard to imagine that they
> could fool an algorithm trying to find "Watson-Crick" base pairs.

The base pair determination algorithm was recently updated (version
6.18.0 https://github.com/Amber-MD/cpptraj/pull/1018), so in theory
non-WC base pairing should also be detected (which can be the case in
e.g. Z-DNA, G-quadruplexes etc). However, the new "better"
determination method is only about 4 months old so there is probably
still room for improvement.

-Dan

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Jul 07 2023 - 11:30:02 PDT
Custom Search