Re: [AMBER] Settings for CHAMM FF?

From: Carlos Simmerling via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 18:05:35 -0400

There is a fair body of work suggesting that water models are as important
(or more) than the solute force field for things like IDPs.

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, 5:57 PM Matthew Guberman-Pfeffer via AMBER <
amber.ambermd.org> wrote:

> Dear AMBER community,
>
> Are there settings for 1-4 interactions (or the like) that need to be set
> to specific values to run simulations using the CHARMM 36m force field with
> PMEMD?
>
> I'm going to also use ff14sb, but some have claimed in the literature that
> CHARMM36m is better for amyloidogenic proteins., so I want to run two sets
> of simulations.)
>
> I’ve already used chamber to convert the topology.
>
> Any other suggestions for modeling fibrils of a disordered protein are
> also welcome!
>
> Best,
> Matthew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Nov 03 2022 - 15:30:03 PDT
Custom Search