Re: [AMBER] Separation of protein and ligand during TI simulation.

From: Fanyu Zhao via AMBER <amber.ambermd.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 11:47:32 +0800

Hi David,

Thanks for reminding me!

I used iwrap=1, and also used autoimage to try to image the ligand. But it
still stays out of the pocket.

I convert ligand 1 to another ligand 2 which has a similar structure to
ligand 1.

Best,
Fanyu

On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 8:28 PM David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 15, 2022, Fanyu Zhao wrote:
> >Hi David,
>
> Please send amber-related questions to the mail reflector,
> amber.ambermd.org,
> and not to me personally. That way, many people can see your question and
> try
> to help, and the answers can help others with similar questions. See
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.ambermd.org_mailman_listinfo_amber&d=DwIBAg&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=TA6Yv1GqGslhLaifgggoUQ&m=Q7_hNcimQ2AHHXrLaOHNS86MXglb4YIc2QvlwPMk2Da_5e-ERuAXiAYC77REeuXJ&s=fjC1N3nb0it2R0QaaO7-v1wHGtRva9MqDeJQo7MhHYw&e=
> for information on how to
> subscribe.
> >
> >I actually visualised trajectories for every window. But the input files
> >for the window with separation and the one working find are basically the
> >same, except the value of clambda. The ligand just suddenly popped out
> from
> >the pocket during production run with GPU.
> >
>
> How finely are you sampling snapshots in the trajectory. If the ligand
> "suddenly popped out", it might indeed be an imaging problem. Are you
> running with iwrap=0?
>
> At the endpoints of some TI runs, the ligands become decoupled from the
> environment. Are you converting one ligand to another, or converting the
> ligand to "nothing"?
>
> ....dac
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Oct 15 2022 - 21:00:02 PDT
Custom Search