Re: [AMBER] Amber MD NAN (1-4 NB = ************** 1-4 EEL = ************** )

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:54:53 -0400

in addition to what Dave suggested, you might take a look at the system
you're simulating. Do you have any nonstandard parameter libraries?

On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 9:42 AM David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021, mish wrote:
>
> >What I wonder most is why MD keeps running despite having NAN in energy
> >terms and coordinates.
>
> The GPU code is written to be highly efficient, and doesn't waste time
> checking for very rare numerical errors. So one needs to be careful.
>
> The most likely cause of your error lies in having two few non-bonded cells
> in the unit cell. It's worth trying a smaller cutoff, and/or a bigger unit
> cell. I'm not an expert here, but recall some discussions with Dave
> Cerutti
> about such a problem. (You have a cutoff of 10, and don't ever report what
> your unit cell size is (it's reported in the output file). If the ratio
> gets to be less than 3 or 4, problems may arise.
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Nov 05 2021 - 07:00:04 PDT
Custom Search