Re: [AMBER] MAXPR error in sander sp job

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:56:24 -0500

If you did the MD with periodic system, you should evaluate the energy for
ap the same way. Otherwise it won't be the energies for the conditions you
simulated. I suggest using a similar I out as for md, and look at the imin
flag in sander, specifically the imin=5 option. That is what I would do.

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021, 6:32 PM Vaibhav Dixit <vaibhavadixit.gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry if my description wasn't confusing. I did MD with periodic and sp
> calculations with nonperiodic system.
> Thanks for suggesting, I will try that out.
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021, 03:40 David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021, Vaibhav Dixit wrote:
> > >
> > >Now I already have MD and SP (nonperiodic) Es for systems with waterbox
> > >sizes 10, 15 and 25A (thus I'm guessing closest in not required now).
> Can
> > >you please suggest, what are probable reasons for the original MAXPR
> error
> > >and how to try to fix it?
> >
> > You can try to set igb=6. But I'm not sure how you did your MD on the
> > nonperiodic systems. If you sure that you have a good water environment,
> > then using igb=6 may help.
> >
> > ....dac
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Feb 20 2021 - 16:00:02 PST
Custom Search