Re: [AMBER] Error searching for compatible GPU

From: Camila Clemente <camilamaraclemente.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 13:00:53 -0300

Hi David!

a) Amber20
b)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 390.132 Driver Version: 390.132
  |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr.
ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute
M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 Tesla C2070 Off | 00000000:02:00.0 Off |
 Off |
| 30% 67C P0 N/A / N/A | 0MiB / 6067MiB | 0%
 Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU
Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage
   |
|=============================================================================|
| No running processes found
  |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

c) I have attached the mdout file (r_500_eq.mdout). The same is observed
when I included export CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 (r_500_eq_2.mdout).

Thank you !!!!!

El dom., 16 ago. 2020 a las 9:04, David A Case (<david.case.rutgers.edu>)
escribió:

> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020, Camila Clemente wrote:
> >
> >I'm trying to run pmemd.cuda on a cluster that it owns:
> >
> >### gpu (Tesla K20X): 1-2
> >### gpu (Tesla M2090): 1-3
> >
> >By running this:
> >
> >$AMBERHOME/bin/pmemd.cuda -O -i eq.mdin -p r_500.wet.complex.prmtop -c
> >r_500_term.rst7 -r r_500_eq.rst7 -o r_500_eq.mdout -x r_500_eq.nc
> >
> >And the error I get is this:
> >Error searching for compatible GPU.
>
> Please report (a) what version of Amber you are using; (b) what the result
> of
> typing "nvidia-smi" is; (3) post the entire mdout file, so that we can
> see the entire error message and its context.
>
> You could certainly try "export CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0" so see if that
> makes
> a difference. You could also try running the test cases, but I'm guessing
> that will give you the same error repeatedly.
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>


-- 
*Camila*




_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

Received on Sun Aug 16 2020 - 09:30:03 PDT
Custom Search