Dear Souvik,
Thanks for clarifying, however, I still have some doubts about the relative
time parameters.
For example, when loading the MD trajectory (5000 frames of 21000 ps MD
with dt=0.002ps), and changing tcorr to,
 for example, 21000 (ps) with tstep=0.002, it still gives the same results
as if tcorr= 100 (ps) and tstep=0.002 (ps) were being used:
It is like the tcorr parameter is ignored at all.
Cheers,
Manuele
Il giorno mer 15 lug 2020 alle ore 17:06 Souvik <sdey8.uic.edu> ha scritto:
>
>    Dear Emanuele,
>
>
>    Tstep is how often you save your trajectory. Your simulation timestep is
>    0.002 ps but did you save every frame and did not skip anything? Also,
> tcorr
>    is the limit upto which you wish to calculate the correlation function
> in
>    ps. So, when you use tcorr to be 100, you would only calculate it upto
> 100
>    ps whereas you have a trajectory of 21000 ps.
>
>
>    Cheers,
>
>    Souvik
>
>
>    Sent from [1]Mail for Windows 10
>
>
>    From: [2]emanuele falbo
>    Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 9:30 AM
>    To: [3]AMBER Mailing List
>    Subject: Re: [AMBER] CPPTRAJ: Time Correlation Function (TCF)
>
>
>    Dear Daniel,
>
>
>    Thanks for the heads-up, however, I decided to only focus on relevant
>
>    ligands and
>
>    not to use the loops. That said, I managed to get the TCF, however, I am
>
>    having another type of issues:
>
>    essentially, the time in output of "timecorr" doesn't correspond to the
>
>    full time of the dynamics.
>
>
>    For example, I run a 21000 ps MD with tstep=0.002, and from the
> following
>
>    commands
>
>
>    >parm ../../topology.prmtop
>
>    >trajin .././trajectory.mdcrd
>
>    >vector v1 .536 .700
>
>    >timecorr vec1 v1 tstep 0.002 tcorr 100.0 out p-p_1.dat order 2
>
>    >run
>
>
>    the time variable in the file p-p_1.dat goes from 0-to-9.9980 and not to
>
>    20.0.
>
>    ote, I also tried to change tcorr, but the results is the same.
>
>    Do you have any idea of what's being wrong here ? Thanks.
>
>
>    Cheers,
>
>    Manuele
>
>
>    Il giorno lun 29 giu 2020 alle ore 16:16 Daniel Roe <
> daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
>
>    ha scritto:
>
>
>    > Hi,
>
>    >
>
>    > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 9:26 AM emanuele falbo <
> falbo.emanuele.gmail.com>
>
>    > wrote:
>
>    > >
>
>    > > So, does tstep need to equal to the one used in the MD to have the
>
>    > > correct TCF ?
>
>    >
>
>    > Yes.
>
>    >
>
>    > >
>
>    > > Secondly, If one wants the full TCF for the distance between two
> oxygens
>
>    > > with   respectively atom type O1 and O2, does the command " vector
> v1
>
>    > >  .%O1 .%O2" give the desired quantity ?
>
>    >
>
>    > No, that will use the center of mass of all atoms of type O1 to the
>
>    > center of mass of all atoms of type O2. If you want every type O1 to
>
>    > every type O2, you'll have to use the 'multivector' analysis command
>
>    > or use a 'for X inmask' style loop.
>
>    >
>
>    > -Dan
>
>    >
>
>    > >
>
>    > > Best Regards,
>
>    > > Manuele
>
>    > >
>
>    > > --
>
>    > >
>
>    > > *Emanuele Falbo*
>
>    > > PhD student
>
>    > > Penfold group
>
>    > > School of Natural and Environmental Sciences
>
>    > > Bedson Building, Newcastle University
>
>    > > Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
>
>    > > w: http://tompenfoldresearch.weebly.com/
>
>    > > _______________________________________________
>
>    > > AMBER mailing list
>
>    > > AMBER.ambermd.org
>
>    > > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>    >
>
>    > _______________________________________________
>
>    > AMBER mailing list
>
>    > AMBER.ambermd.org
>
>    > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>    >
>
>
>
>    --
>
>
>    *Emanuele Falbo*
>
>    PhD student
>
>    Penfold group
>
>    School of Natural and Environmental Sciences
>
>    Bedson Building, Newcastle University
>
>    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
>
>    w: http://tompenfoldresearch.weebly.com/
>
>    _______________________________________________
>
>    AMBER mailing list
>
>    AMBER.ambermd.org
>
>    http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
> References
>
>    1. https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986
>    2. mailto:falbo.emanuele.gmail.com
>    3. mailto:amber.ambermd.org
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
-- 
*Emanuele Falbo*
PhD student
Penfold group
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences
Bedson Building, Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
w: http://tompenfoldresearch.weebly.com/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jul 16 2020 - 02:00:03 PDT