Hi Daniel,
There are the differences:
there is no box info bottom in the 220th_restart.rst7 file. The number of
lines is actually different
,i.e., 717 (file.rst7) and 4602 ( 220th_restart.rst7), since the first is a
netcdf file, while the second an ascii one.
Just to make it clear, in cpptraj I get :
>parm topology.prmtop
>trajin trajectory.mdcrd 220 220 1
[trajin trajectory.mdcrd]
Reading 'trajectory.mdcrd' as Amber NetCDF
Warning: Box information present in topology but not in trajectory.
Warning: DISABLING BOX in topology 'topology.prmtop'!
>
Could it be that sander didn't print out the box info into the trajectory
during the minimization ?
Cheers,
Manuele
Il giorno gio 21 mag 2020 alle ore 19:05 David A Case <
david.case.rutgers.edu> ha scritto:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020, emanuele falbo wrote:
>
> >
> >*Note that if I use the file.rst7 from the minimization, which would
> >correspond to the last frame, the MD goes like a charm. This makes me
> >thing that the box is present,*
>
> You can just look at the bottom of the restart file to see if the box
> info is on the last line. Also, do other comparisons between the two
> rst7 file: are they the same size, number of lines, etc?
>
> >
> >*but there is something wrong when extracting the frame in cpptraj. In
> >cpptraj the way I do is:*
> >
> >parm topology.prmtop
> >trajin trajectory.nc 200 200 1
> >trajout restart_200th.rst7 restart
> >run
> >
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
--
*Emanuele Falbo*
PhD student
Penfold group
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences
Bedson Building, Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU
w: http://tompenfoldresearch.weebly.com/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri May 22 2020 - 01:30:02 PDT
