Re: [AMBER] minimizing a pyridine in water

From: Debarati DasGupta <debarati_dasgupta.hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:53:48 +0000

Hello Prof Case,
I see segfault when running from the main console!
Thanks
Debarati

[cid:image002.png.01D61CA3.A7818AA0]

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: David A Case<mailto:david.case.rutgers.edu>
Sent: 27 April 2020 14:28
To: Debarati DasGupta<mailto:debarati_dasgupta.hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AMBER] minimizing a pyridine in water

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020, Debarati DasGupta wrote:
>
>
>Ans: Page 329 of AMBER18 manual says “Since SHAKE is an algorithm based
>on dynamics, the minimizer is not aware of what SHAKE is doing; for this
>reason, minimizations generally should be carried out without SHAKE”. I
>thought we did not use SHAKE in minimization steps...

It's still worth seeing if SHAKE makes a difference. Having your job
seemingly stop, but not exit from slurm, may reflect something about the
queue manager. Running 1000 steps on a small system should take a
minimal amount of time: could you run this outside the queueing system,
just to eliminate that as a possible source of confusion?

....dac



_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

3C68E36E6DE845A08FD0476A3C40D58F.png
(image/png attachment: 3C68E36E6DE845A08FD0476A3C40D58F.png)

Received on Mon Apr 27 2020 - 12:00:03 PDT
Custom Search