Re: [AMBER] vlimit exceeded for step

From: Sadaf Rani <sadafrani6.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:02:36 +0100

Hi David and Amber users
I did two-step minimization. In the first step I keep the heavy atoms fixed
and minimized solvent and in the second step, I did minimization for the
complete system. In both I get error of ***** REPEATED LINMIN FAILURE
*****.
*For the first step minimization input and result is as follows:-*
Minimization with Cartesian restraints for the solute

 &cntrl

 imin=1, maxcyc=100000,

 ntmin=1, ncyc= 1000,

 ntpr=5,

 ntr=1,

 &end

Group input for restrained atoms

100.0

RES 1 491

END

END

 27735 -2.7469E+05 9.3928E-03 1.8648E+00 CG 3759

 BOND = 21121.9343 ANGLE = 1047.6745 DIHED =
6126.8150
 VDWAALS = 50817.5947 EEL = -374077.1085 HBOND =
 0.0000
 1-4 VDW = 2103.1482 1-4 EEL = 18037.6420 RESTRAINT =
 129.8722
 EAMBER = -274822.2997


   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
  27740 -2.7469E+05 9.3699E-03 1.8599E+00 CG 3759

 BOND = 21121.9343 ANGLE = 1047.6745 DIHED =
6126.8150
 VDWAALS = 50817.5949 EEL = -374077.1088 HBOND =
 0.0000
 1-4 VDW = 2103.1482 1-4 EEL = 18037.6421 RESTRAINT =
 129.8722
 EAMBER = -274822.2998


   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
  27745 -2.7469E+05 9.3683E-03 1.8595E+00 CG 3759

 BOND = 21121.9343 ANGLE = 1047.6745 DIHED =
6126.8150
 VDWAALS = 50817.5949 EEL = -374077.1088 HBOND =
 0.0000
 1-4 VDW = 2103.1482 1-4 EEL = 18037.6421 RESTRAINT =
 129.8722
 EAMBER = -274822.2998

     ... RESTARTED DUE TO LINMIN FAILURE ...

     ***** REPEATED LINMIN FAILURE *****

*For the second step minimization input and result is as follows:-*

Minimization of the entire molecular system

 &cntrl

  imin=1, maxcyc=50000,

  ntpr=5,

 &end



   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
  29640 -2.7917E+05 4.5493E-03 2.9666E-01 H1 44506

 BOND = 21276.6440 ANGLE = 1174.1935 DIHED =
5770.7288
 VDWAALS = 50844.8463 EEL = -377356.3823 HBOND =
 0.0000
 1-4 VDW = 1606.3203 1-4 EEL = 17510.6896 RESTRAINT =
 0.0000


   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
  29645 -2.7917E+05 4.5456E-03 2.9654E-01 H1 44506

 BOND = 21276.6441 ANGLE = 1174.1935 DIHED =
5770.7288
 VDWAALS = 50844.8463 EEL = -377356.3825 HBOND =
 0.0000
 1-4 VDW = 1606.3203 1-4 EEL = 17510.6896 RESTRAINT =
 0.0000

     .... RESTARTED DUE TO LINMIN FAILURE ...


                    FINAL RESULTS



   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
  29649 -2.7917E+05 4.5456E-03 2.9654E-01 H1 44506

 BOND = 21276.6441 ANGLE = 1174.1935 DIHED =
5770.7288
 VDWAALS = 50844.8463 EEL = -377356.3825 HBOND =
 0.0000
 1-4 VDW = 1606.3203 1-4 EEL = 17510.6896 RESTRAINT =
 0.0000

     ***** REPEATED LINMIN FAILURE *****

*I did checkvalidity also in parmed and it says prmtop is ok*

parmed complex.prmtop

 _~__________________
 |_|_______________|_|
 | ,-------------. |
 | | .---------. | |
 | | |P | | |
 | | | a | | |
 | | | r | | |
 | | | m ED | | |
 | | `---------' | |
 | `---------------' |
 | _ ParmedBoy |
 | _| |_ ,-. |
 ||_ O _| ,-. "._,"|
 | |_| "._," A |
 | _ _ B |
 | // // |
 | // // \\\\\\ |
 | ` ` \\\\\\ ,
 |________...______,"

ParmEd: a Parameter file Editor


Loaded Amber topology file complex.prmtop
Reading input from STDIN...
> checkValidity
Determining validity of prmtop

*complex.prmtop looks OK to me!> *
What should I do to fix this error? Need your suggestions, please.

Sadaf


On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:13 AM David Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, Sadaf Rani wrote:
>
> >I am running equilibration of protein-ligand complex system
> >vlimit exceeded for step 0; vmax = 1751.7001
>
> This implies that your starting structure has bad forces, even at the
> first step. Have you run a minimization before this?
>
> You can also use the checkValidity action (in parmed) or the
> checkStructure action (in cpptraj) to look for common problems.
>
> >
> > Coordinate resetting cannot be accomplished,
> > deviation is too large
> > iter_cnt, my_bond_idx, i and j are : 1 24 7053 7052
>
> Atoms 7053 and 7052 are (at least) one place where there are problems.
> You could look at these areas (say with a visualization program) to see
> if you can spot the problem. But somehow, you need a better starting
> structure. Minimization will usually, but not always, provide this.
>
> ....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Aug 21 2019 - 02:30:02 PDT
Custom Search