Re: [AMBER] Suggestion about proper ANTECHAMBER usage

From: Saikat Dutta chowdhury <pbr322.dutta.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 19:24:27 +0530

Respected Prof. Case,

Thank you for your reply. Yes, paA has a net charge of -1.

with regards,
Saikat

On Fri, 17 May, 2019, 18:56 David A Case, <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, May 17, 2019, Saikat Dutta chowdhury wrote:
>
> >I have isolated the lipid coordinates from the original pdb and used
> >avogadro to add hydrogens. The charge of the lipid head group is -1.
> >
> >I am using the following command for parameterization.
> >
> >antechamber -i paA-new.pdb -fi pdb -o paA.mol2 -fo mol2 -c bcc -s 2 -at
> >gaff2 -nc -1
> >
> >My question is whether I am doing it correctly as I am using the "-nc"
> flag
> >with -1?
>
> Looks OK to me: if the charge of "paA" is -1, then you need the nc flag
> you use above.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri May 17 2019 - 07:00:02 PDT
Custom Search