Re: [AMBER] RMSF of combined trajectory

From: Bill Ross <>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 04:59:21 -0700

Are the connectivities  and mot importantly, the atom orders the same?
If so, the prmtop shouldn't matter, unless you are using mass-weighted
RMS and the topologies use different atom masses, I believe.


On 5/16/19 4:43 AM, Rinsha Chk wrote:
> Hello,
> I had combined trajectories with different topology file, in order to get
> rmsf of the combined trajectory which topology should I use?
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list

AMBER mailing list
Received on Thu May 16 2019 - 05:00:02 PDT
Custom Search