Re: [AMBER] QM/MM dynamics: metal oxides

From: David Case <david.case.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:18:27 +0000

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, emanuele falbo wrote:

>Sorry , I meant that the dynamics fails when the M solute molecule and 15
>Li ions are both treated with semi-empirical PM6, whereas the water at MM
>level .

First: there is (I think) no reason to treat Li+ ions as quantum
mechanical. Are you expecting any electron transfer from the metal?

Second: there is a good reason not to do this: the QM/MM code is
designed for a compact QM region. As I understand it, your Li ions may
move all over the place.

Finally: you are correct in noting that SCF failures can be hard to fix,
especially with a highly negative charge. The Reference Manual has some
suggestions of things to try. But handling metal oxides (as opposed to
organic molecules) may require considerable experimentation.

...good luck...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Jan 26 2019 - 07:30:02 PST
Custom Search