[AMBER] CpHMD: seeking clarification

From: George Tzotzos <gtzotzos.me.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:41:05 +0200

Setting up two distinct simulations (a) conventional MD and (b) CpHMD for and identical solute using parameters for EWALD and TIP3P water, the unperturbed charges of the units were:

 -9 when using the ff14SB force field (conventional MD) and
 -1 when using leaprc.constph (CpHMD)

As my experience with CpHMD is rather limited, I’d be grateful for any clarifications on this issue

Many thanks in advance

George
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Sep 24 2017 - 11:00:02 PDT
Custom Search