Re: [AMBER] help identifying dihedral parameters for paracetemol using Antechamber

From: conor parks <coparks2012.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:13:05 -0400

David,

thank you very much for providing that link. That was very helpful. That
clears up the negative sign issue for me. Thanks! Was my first question,
 correct? I.E. the dihedral potential and forces get evaluated for each
parameter set associated with it, even when there are multiple, and the
results are summed?

Regards,

Conor Parks
B.S.E in Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2012
PhD candidate in Chemical Engineering, Purdue University

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:53 PM, David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> On Tue, May 03, 2016, conor parks wrote:
> >
> > However, in my prmtop file (values given in first email in this chain),
> the
> > periodicity values are given as 1 and 2 (no negative sign). What happened
> > to the negative sign on these periodicity values in my prmtop file?
>
> Please see http://ambermd.org/formats.html#parm.dat. Negative values in a
> parm.dat file have a special meaning.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue May 03 2016 - 13:30:05 PDT
Custom Search