Re: [AMBER] Replacement for xmgrace

From: Hannes Loeffler <Hannes.Loeffler.stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:13:11 +0000

Why would a "less" recent program (whatever you mean by this) be better
than a "more" recent one? What does Grace not do that you would want
to see in another program?

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:48:31 +0100
Jean-Patrick Francoia <jeanpatrick.francoia.gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just a quick question. Is there a better (meaning: more recent)
> program than xmgrace to analyse the outputs of MD ? Preferably one
> that runs on Linux.
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Feb 01 2016 - 02:30:04 PST
Custom Search