Re: [AMBER] RED vIII for Amber

From: Nash, Anthony <a.nash.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 17:23:28 +0000

I managed to get through to the RED server, and even register (even got
the email). Yet from the homepage the PyRED (REDSD) doesn¡¯t load.

http://upjv.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/index.php


Anyone had any news with regards to this service? I emailed several
authors only two weeks ago and I haven¡¯t had a single reply.

Thanks
Anthony



On 14/12/2015 07:50, "Nash, Anthony" <a.nash.ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

>Many thanks Karl,
>
>That¡¯s exactly what I¡¯ve been looking for. I recall it was a parameter in
>the project.config file for red vIV, but I¡¯ve yet to be able to find
>whether this was possible in vIII.
>
>Thanks again
>Anthony
>
>
>On 14/12/2015 07:42, "Karl Kirschner" <k.n.kirschner.gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Anthony,
>>
>> I believe the way to do this is to manually include the following line
>>(as an example) in your RED input p2n file:
>>REMARK INTRA-MCC 0.2 | 3 | K
>>
>>The 0.2 is the charge that you want to constrain atom #3 to have during
>>the
>>fitting process. You can include as many of these lines as the number of
>>atoms that you want to keep the partial atomic charge constrained to.
>>
>>Bests,
>>Karl
>>
>>On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Nash, Anthony <a.nash.ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> With the RED server having gone down, I know a link to the older
>>>version
>>> scripts (vIII) had been publicised in this Amber community. After
>>>looking
>>> through the various scripts, it seems relatively easy to set up on a
>>>local
>>> system with access to Gaussian. However, after carefully going through
>>>the
>>> only .pdf tutorial for vIII I didn't find anything to do with
>>>restraining
>>> the calculation of point charges to certain regions of an amino acid.
>>>If I
>>> recall correctly, the defunct online service allowed you to provide a
>>> project and system file. One of these files enabled the user to specify
>>>a
>>> list of atoms which would not contribute to the calculation of point
>>> charges (essentially capped ends to an amino acid backbone). Was this
>>>one
>>> of the differences between III and IV?
>>>
>>> I©öm getting the feeling I©öll need to move back onto Antechamber.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Anthony
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AMBER mailing list
>>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Karl. N. Kirschner, Ph.D.
>>Research Associate
>>Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences
>>Grantham-Allee 20, 54757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
>>_______________________________________________
>>AMBER mailing list
>>AMBER.ambermd.org
>>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER mailing list
>AMBER.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Dec 20 2015 - 09:30:03 PST
Custom Search