Re: [AMBER] Why PBSA decomposition takes so long time?

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:10:01 -0400

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:52 AM, MarcZhang <progress0935zhang.gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Amber user group
>
>
>
> I would like to estimate the contributions of residues in the pocket to
> ligand binding by decomposing deltaG onto each residue using MMPBSA.py
>
>
>
> However, the calculation of decomposition cannot be completed. Could
> someone
> tell me why it is?
>

​I *suspect* that is because for pairwise decomposition, each residue pair
requires its own, separate PB calculation. The PB energy expression really
has no parts that are easily decomposed into pairwise interactions.

I would typically not recommend using PB for pairwise decomposition
(per-residue decomposition probably wouldn't be as bad).​


Does amber have any other module/script for energy decomposition?
>

​Not if you want to include solvation effects through GB or PB. But GB
decomposition is a *lot* faster (about the same speed as "regular" GB
without decomposing per-residue contributions).

HTH,
Jason

-- 
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Oct 30 2015 - 07:30:03 PDT
Custom Search