Re: [AMBER] Solvent accessible surface area (SASA) calculation in CPPTRJ

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 15:23:21 -0400

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 3:03 PM, George Tzotzos <gtzotzos.me.com> wrote:

> Thank you Jason,
>
> Just a clarification.
>
> I quote your message:
>
> >> In the affirmative is there a way to validate this?
> >>
> > ​​
> > ​In the single-trajectory processing (where you get a frame-by-frame
> > difference between bound and unbound SASAs), there's no other explanation
> > for a difference in SASA, so the ligand *must* be the culprit.
>
> Do you mean single or three-trajectory processing?
>

​The single trajectory protocol, as defined in the MM/PBSA parlance.

HTH,
Jason

-- 
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Aug 24 2015 - 12:30:05 PDT
Custom Search