Re: [AMBER] Different convergence in pmemd.cuda against CPU

From: Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:43:42 -0800

What do you mean by x4 or x8 parallel? - It is very unlikely the GPU code
will scale to this number of GPUs and it is rarely tested. Please try with
1 GPU first and see what the density converges to and we can investigate
from there.

All the best
Ross


On 12/15/14, 8:42 PM, "Hiromasa WATANABE" <hi-watanabe.hpc.co.jp> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>We have run TIP3P water system (300K, 1bar) using AMBER12(patch 21).
>
>pmemd.cuda(x4 or x8 parallel) converge density to 0.95g/cc,
>whereas sander(x8), pmemd(x8) and pmemd.cuda(x1, x2) converge to 0.98g/cc.
>
>Please suggest any ideas to us.
>
>Best regards,
>WATANABE
>
>--
>Hiromasa WATANABE
>Manager, Ph.D.
>HPC Dept., Technology Gr., HPC SYSTEMS Inc.
>Head office: LOOP-X 8F, 3-9-15 Wangan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan 108-0022.
>Email: hi-watanabe.hpc.co.jp
>www.hpc.co.jp
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER mailing list
>AMBER.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber



_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Dec 15 2014 - 22:00:02 PST
Custom Search