The following error has been occurred during parametrization of the
entirely protein using
source leaprc.ff99SB
source leaprc.gaff
loadoff crq.lib # lib for chromophore
dsRED = loadpdb 1zgo.pdb # pdb of the GFP w/o hydrogens
bond dsRED.65.C dsRED.66.N # link N of chromophore to the C of previous
residue
bond dsRED.69.N dsRED.66.C # link C of chromophore to the N of next residue
ERROR: Comparing atoms
.R<CRQ 66>.A<CA3 4>,
.R<CRQ 66>.A<O 6>,
.R<CRQ 66>.A<HC4 27>, and
.R<CRQ 66>.A<HC5 28>
to atoms
.R<CRQ 66>.A<CA3 4>,
.R<SER 1>.A<N 1>,
.R<CRQ 66>.A<O 6>, and
.R<CRQ 66>.A<HC4 27>
This error may be due to faulty Connection atoms.
!FATAL ERROR----------------------------------------
!FATAL: In file [chirality.c], line 142
!FATAL: Message: Atom named N from SER did not match !
!
!ABORTING.
This might be due to the presence of the alternative coppies of some atoms
in the initial pdb which has been warned by amber
Loading PDB file: ./1zgo.pdb
-- residue 21: duplicate [ CB] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 21: duplicate [ CG2] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 21: duplicate [ OG1] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 65: duplicate [ C] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 65: duplicate [ CA] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 65: duplicate [ O] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 66: duplicate [ C1] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 66: duplicate [ CA1] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 66: duplicate [ CB1] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 66: duplicate [ N] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 66: duplicate [ N2] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 66: duplicate [ N3] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 67: duplicate [ CB] atoms (total 2)
-- residue 67: duplicate [ OG] atoms (total 2)
Warning: Atom names in each residue should be unique.
(Same-name atoms are handled by using the first
occurrence and by ignoring the rest.
Frequently duplicate atom names stem from alternate
conformations in the PDB file.)
for instance next to the chromophore Ser:
ATOM 521 N SER A 69 18.097 -19.121 43.129 1.00
16.45 N
ANISOU 521 N SER A 69 2024 2279 1948 255 443
327 N
ATOM 522 CA SER A 69 18.107 -19.900 44.359 1.00
15.64 C
ANISOU 522 CA SER A 69 1746 2573 1624 320 841
158 C
ATOM 523 C SER A 69 18.099 -18.961 45.552 1.00
17.01 C
ANISOU 523 C SER A 69 2148 2306 2010 410 627
5 C
ATOM 524 O SER A 69 18.979 -19.020 46.424 1.00
18.95 O
ANISOU 524 O SER A 69 2315 2556 2328 469 366
-403 O
ATOM 525 CB ASER A 69 19.342 -20.803 44.326 0.61
18.43 C
ANISOU 525 CB ASER A 69 2420 2848 1736 925 435
55 C
ATOM 526 CB BSER A 69 19.323 -20.829 44.377 0.39
15.10 C
ANISOU 526 CB BSER A 69 1914 2420 1402 383 1013
460 C
ATOM 527 OG ASER A 69 19.430 -21.790 45.329 0.61
19.53 O
ANISOU 527 OG ASER A 69 2960 2192 2268 230 -145
-11 O
ATOM 528 OG BSER A 69 20.482 -20.100 44.010 0.39
14.94 O
ANISOU 528 OG BSER A 69 2035 1880 1762 687 1569
455 O
how to ignore all alternative coordinates and fix it?
TFH,
James
2014-05-14 16:12 GMT+04:00 Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>:
> On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 13:00 +0100, Marc van der Kamp wrote:
> > Just a minor addition to Jasons answer:
> > There is one type of MM parameter that is not irrelevant for the QM
> atoms:
> > the non-bonded van der Waals parameters. These are used for the van der
> > Waals interactions between MM and QM atoms.
> > For most purposes, the atomtyping done by antechamber should be
> sufficient.
>
> An important clarification. Thanks.
>
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> BioMaPS,
> Rutgers University
> Postdoctoral Researcher
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed May 14 2014 - 08:30:04 PDT
