Re: [AMBER] Is there a trick to fix a poor structural feature?

From: Jonathan Gough <jonathan.d.gough.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:32:21 -0400

Very helpful, thank you!

So, if I understand this correctly, checkoverlap (using the default of
0.95) should not produce any results. additionally, I need to double check
that there aren't any H's too close to the phosphates.


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:20 PM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, Jonathan Gough wrote:
> >
>
> > I didn't mention before, but will now (as I believe this is the REAL
> issue)
> > There are phosphates on a few residues.
>
> Check to see if you have hydrogens somewhere that are getting very close to
> the phosphate oxygens. For example, stop the MD simulation before the ****
> start to appear, and use the checkoverlap command to look for close
> contacts.
>
> Many hydrogens in Amber force fields have zero van der Walls radius, and
> can
> get too close to phosphate groups. Of course, this is just a guess...there
> might be some other type of bad overlap that is leading to this behavior.
> Finding out what is going on is the first step towards a fix.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Apr 24 2013 - 14:00:02 PDT
Custom Search