Hi,
In addition to what Jason said, make sure you've also installed all of
the available bugfixes:
http://ambermd.org/bugfixes11.html
I don't think any of them apply to gb, but it can't hurt.
-Dan
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:
> The tests with small differences are fine -- e.g., the diff is 0.01 or
> something like that. The ones with larger differences (namely, the igb=7
> test) is cause for worry, so you should be careful if you wish to use that
> functionality.
>
> HTH,
> Jason
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Mary Varughese <maryvj1985.gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Sir,
>>
>> I have tried to install amber11 and run the tests in parallel in the test
>> suite of amber11/test/. the files generated are attached along. Would you
>> please help me to analyze the log files for any significant errors that
>> need to be corrected? I used only two processors of the same system.(dual
>> core processor) using the command
>> cd $AMBERHOME/test/
>> export DO_PARALLEL='mpirun -np 4'
>> make test.parallel
>>
>> Thank you Sir.
>>
>> --
>> Mary Varughese
>> Research Scholar
>> School of Pure and Applied Physics
>> Mahatma Gandhi University
>> India
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> Quantum Theory Project,
> University of Florida
> Ph.D. Candidate
> 352-392-4032
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
--
-------------------------
Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
University of Utah
30 South 2000 East, Room 201
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
(801) 587-9652
(801) 585-9119 (Fax)
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Jan 21 2013 - 09:30:04 PST
