Re: [AMBER] using igb=7

From: jit mukherjee <jitiitkgp.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:31:10 +0530

Dear Carlos,
Thanks for your reply. You advised me to use igb=1 only. Why only igb=1 and
not igb=2 (igb=2 is better than igb=1 to describe true molecular volume,
i.e. , closer to real situation than using igb=1). Is the effective Born
radii are not rescaled for nucleic acid or the corresponding bases? Please
clarify.

Regards,
jit
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Sep 04 2012 - 10:30:03 PDT
Custom Search