Re: [AMBER] AMBER 12 benchmarks

From: Hannes Loeffler <Hannes.Loeffler.stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:27:14 +0100

On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 13:02:42 -0400
Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:

> Updated (and better) compiler flags are also a possible explanation (I
> think I recall Robin adding -mtune=native to the GNU compiler
> optimization flags between the Amber 11 and Amber 12 releases).
> Unless care was taken to apply exactly the same compiler flags (and
> obviously compilers) from Amber 11 to Amber 12, I'm not exactly sure
> where to ascribe the performance differences to.
>
> Are the reported benchmarks "out-of-the-box" compilations (sans edits
> to the config.h file)?

I made no changes to the config.h file. I guess that was also done
for AMBER 11 because I simply followed internal guides how to compile
the code on Cray XE6.

Cheers,
Hannes.
-- 
Scanned by iCritical.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jul 11 2012 - 01:30:03 PDT
Custom Search