Re: [AMBER] binding energy calculations

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:33:49 -0400

On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:33 PM, kirtana S <skirtana4.gmail.com> wrote:

> I used sander with igb=10 ( to activate pbsa calculation as in manual) with
> vacuum trajectory with ions and solvent removed.
>
> &cntrl
> imin=5,
> gbsa=1,

PBSA calculates the non-polar energies on its own, so there is no need to set gbsa=1 here.

What is happening is the surface area is being calculated twice.

I would suggest looking through the pbsa section of the manual for details about available pbsa parameters (or using MMPBSA.py to create a sample input file.

> surften=1,

This sets the surface tension to 1. Therefore, the esurf and enpolar will be the LCPO-calculated SASA, to which you have to multiply your real surface tension (e.g., 0.0072 is used for MMPBSA.py calculations in GB solvent) in order to get non-polar energies.

HTH,
Jason

--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Apr 09 2012 - 22:00:04 PDT
Custom Search