Re: [AMBER] Ordering of torsion definitions

From: Peter Eastman <peastman.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 11:56:16 -0700

I'm really just trying to understand what AMBER does. I'm adapting the AMBER force fields for use with OpenMM. My goal is to interpret the parameter files correctly, where "correctly" is defined as, "Giving identical results to AMBER."

Peter


On Oct 4, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Bill Ross wrote:

>> So is this the correct set of rules to use?
>>
>> 1. Within a file, specifics should override wildcards (regardless of order).
>> 2. Definitions in later files should override definitions in earlier files (regardless of whether they're specific or wildcards).
>
> 1 makes sense, not sure what the code does now.
> I think 2. is debatable, it depends on what is desired, but your
> suggestion would make for a simpler implementation.
>
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Oct 04 2011 - 12:00:06 PDT
Custom Search